Nikon camera control pro d31001/5/2024 ![]() This is very strange for me and I’m really confused. Both cameras seem to be an upgrade when compared to my “old D60” but I’d like to know what is the best option considering the points mentioned above and also the price? Considering the D3100 has better specs than the D90 (at least as I’m seeing it), why there is so much difference in price? I mean, is the 50% more expensive camera being the D90, worth buying when compared to the “more spec’ed” D3100? As argued above, at least as regards megapixels, ISO & vidoe quality comparisons, it’s not. My problem here is whether to stay on the entry level and get the D3100 or whether to move on to “apparently” the next step and get the D90. But as said before, the D90 is 50% more expensive with 2 years older technology than the D3100! However the “video thing” is not an issue to me as I’m after photographic specs rather than video specs. What’s a bit confusing for me however is the fact that the D3100 has better mega pixels over the D90 (12M vs 14M respectively) and also has a better ISO compared to the D90 as well, and at the same time it’s much cheaper! Both cameras have a video but it seems that the D3100 produces a better quality HD video. I made some research and apparently, the D3100 is an entry level camera (like the one I owned before) while the D90 is more of an advanced-level camera. ![]() I am starting to get a bit confused on what I should consider between the 2. I was comparing the new on the market Nikon D3100 with the Nikon D90. Until a couple of weeks ago I was a proud owner of a Nikon D60 but unfortunately I was burgled so now I have to think about buying another camera. I have a dilemma and would appreciate if anyone here can help me.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |